You are here

Elbasvir/Grazoprevir Superior to Sofosbuvir Plus PegIFN and Ribavirin in Phase 3 Hepatitis Trial

Virological cure achieved in 99% of patients

Results have been reported from the C-EDGE Head-to-Head trial, a comparative, phase 3, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Zepatier (elbasvir and grazoprevir, Merck) 50-mg/100-mg tablets versus a regimen of sofosbuvir 400-mg tablets plus peginterferon and ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) in treatment-naïve and pegIFN/RBV treatment-experienced patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 or GT4 infection.

In that study, Zepatier demonstrated superiority on efficacy and safety endpoints compared with sofosbuvir plus pegIFN/RBV. In the full analysis set (N = 255), the efficacy endpoint of a sustained virological response at 12 weeks after the completion of therapy (SVR12, considered a virological cure) was achieved in 128 of 129 patients (99%) receiving Zepatier versus 114 of 126 patients (90%) receiving sofosbuvir plus pegIFN/RBV.

Zepatier was approved in January 2016 for the treatment of chronic HCV GT1 or GT4 infections in adults, with or without RBV.

The C-EDGE Head-to-Head trial, conducted in Europe, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of treatment with Zepatier compared with that of a 12-week regimen of sofosbuvir plus pegIFN/RBV. The trial enrolled treatment-naïve and pegIFN/RBV treatment-experienced patients, with or without cirrhosis, with chronic HCV GT1 or GT4 infections. A total of 255 GT1- or GT4-infected patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with either Zepatier 50-mg/100-mg tablets (n = 129) or sofosbuvir 400-mg tablets plus pegIFN/RBV (n = 126). At baseline, 17% of the patients had compensated cirrhosis; 67% had HCV RNA greater than 800,000 IU/mL; 99% were white; 78% had the interleukin 28B non-CC genotype; and approximately 25% had failed prior treatment with pegIFN/RBV (10% prior null responders, 5% prior partial responders, and 10% prior relapsers).

In the Zepatier group, one patient (1%) withdrew from the study after completing treatment. There were no virological failures among the Zepatier-treated patients. In the sofosbuvir plus pegIFN/RBV group, virological failure occurred in 11 patients (9%), and one patient (1%) withdrew from the trial after the first week of treatment.

Zepatier is not for use in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child–Pugh B or C). Zepatier is also not for use with organic anion transporting polypeptides 1B1/3 (OATP1B1/3) inhibitors (e.g., atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, saquinavir, tipranavir, or cyclosporine); strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inducers (e.g., carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampin, St. John’s Wort); or efavirenz.

Source: Merck; April 14, 2016.

Recent Headlines

Citrus, Berries, Broccoli Reduce Risk of Cancer and CVD
Changes in Antibiotic Recommendations for Children
Influences Gene Involved in Circadian Rhythms
‘The Perfect Drug for Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy’
Triggers the Body’s Own Natural Blood Flow Regulation
Inrebic Reduces Symptoms by 50% in Some Patients
Novel Catheter-based Technology for Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke
Decision supported by data from more than 4,000 patients