You are here

‘Cowboy Doctors’ and Health Care Spending

Unnecessary care costs billions per year, Harvard experts say

According to a recent study by Harvard professors and colleagues, “cowboy doctors” — physicians who provide intensive, unnecessary, and often ineffective patient care –– may be driving up U.S. health care costs to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

The study, discussed in Harvard Magazine, found that physicians’ beliefs in clinically unsupported treatment procedures can explain as much as 35% of end-of-life Medicare expenditures, and 12% of Medicare expenditures overall.

Physicians treating a critically ill patient may decide either to provide intensive care beyond the indications of clinical guidelines (such as implanting a defibrillator to counter severe heart failure), or to attempt to make the patient more comfortable by administering palliative care, the article says. The researchers called the former group “cowboys” and the latter “comforters,” and found that their respective concentrations in a region were closely correlated with end-of-life spending as a whole. The data indicated that “cowboy” doctors tend to congregate in southeastern states, such as Florida. They are also more likely to be male, and less likely to be specialists.

Although these doctors may be pushing the frontier of medicine by going above and beyond, said study coauthor Dr. Jonathan Skinner, a professor of economics at Dartmouth, clinical evidence showed that little or no benefit was derived from the extra procedures, resulting in wasteful spending. Cutler suggested that doctors’ beliefs in these ineffective treatments may spring from their self-perception as “interventionists.”

The study noted that few doctors wanted to discuss the option of palliative care with patients, prompting Cutler to draw an analogy to auto mechanics: “You want this engine fixed; I’ll fix it. I’m not going to talk to you about whether you should get a new car — that’s someone else’s job.” But as a result, he said, patients are “ping-ponged back and forth” between the primary-care physician, who recommends a specialist, and the specialist, who prefers to leave the question of whether certain treatments are necessary to the primary-care physician. Meanwhile, medical bills go up.

Traditionally, researchers attempt to get a picture of physicians’ beliefs by analyzing their behaviors. The problem is that other actors, such as patients, can have a say in these behaviors as well. The ability to tease out doctors’ beliefs proved to be the study’s biggest innovation, Cutler said. This was achieved by using “strategic surveys,” which included vignettes of specific patient scenarios, and asking the responding physicians what they would do in each situation. Such surveys are often used in other areas of social science, Stern explained, but have rarely been used to study health care economics.

The researchers found that many physicians reported making decisions supported neither by clinical guidelines nor by medical literature. “Doctors are basically not relying on public scientific evidence,” Skinner said. “They are relying on their own beliefs, developed through time.”

The study also found that most doctors who recommended unnecessary procedures weren’t seeking extra income — suggesting to Cutler that the lack of financial penalty, rather than the presence of financial reward, accounts for “cowboy” doctors’ actions. The health care system’s current incentives, he said, often do not prompt doctors to ask the right questions, such as whether a proposed treatment truly benefits the patient. “If doctors restrict themselves to performing what is evidence-based,” Skinner pointed out, “we can save hundreds of billions of dollars a year.”

According to Dr. Elliott Fisher, a professor of health policy at Dartmouth, a movement is under way to shift the health care payment system toward incentivizing concrete benefits for patients. (A case in point is the hundreds of accountable-care organizations around the country, which seek to reward high-quality, low-cost care.) The new study, Fisher suggests, is important because it highlights a power imbalance in the physician–patient relationship: doctors tend to follow their own beliefs about the right treatment to use, leaving patients little say in the process. How to treat a patient is often a multiple-choice question without a single “correct” answer. When making these decisions, Fisher said, doctors should pay more attention to the patient’s preferences, instead of relying on their own experience.

Sources: Harvard Magazine; September–October 2015; and Harvard Business School; 2015.

Recent Headlines

Breast Cancer, Gastrointestinal Tumors Most Common Types
Two-Thirds of U.S. Alzheimer’s Cases Are Women, And It’s Not Just Because They Live Longer
Recarbrio Should be Reserved For Limited/No Alternative Antibacterial Treatment Cases
NY Hospitals Required to Implement Protocols in Suspected Cases
Presence of BOK Protein Key for Positive Treatment Response
Patient Access to Inhaler Use Data Could Improve Asthma Management
Overall Survival 4.3 Months’ vs. 1.5 Months for Traditional Regimens