You are here
Off-Label Use of Device to Prevent Stroke in A-Fib Patients Is Potentially Dangerous, Researchers Find
The Lariat device, which has been cleared by the FDA for soft-tissue approximation (suture placement) during surgical procedures, is associated with a significant incidence of death and urgent cardiac surgery during its frequent off-label use to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, according to researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
After reviewing case reports and an FDA safety database, the authors are calling for formal controlled investigations into the safety and efficacy of the off-label use of the Lariat device, which has never been approved for treatment of this condition. Their study results were published May 4 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“Not only do we believe that high-quality, randomized clinical trials are necessary to determine the safety of the Lariat device for off-label procedures, but our analysis raises broader issues with the FDA 510(k) clearance protocol for medical devices,” said study senior author Jay Giri, MD, MPH. “We believe there needs to be a method for reassessing the safety of a device that has been cleared for one use but is being frequently used for a different purpose in real-world practice.”
The Lariat device received FDA 510(k) class II (intermediate risk) clearance for soft- tissue approximation in June 2006 based on stated “substantial equivalence” with other devices used to place sutures during laparoscopic surgeries or vein harvesting. The FDA 510(k) clearance pathway does not require the rigorous testing and evaluation that is needed for full FDA premarket approval of class I (high-risk) devices. However, the researchers say it appears that the Lariat device has never been used for these purposes. Instead, all reported instances of Lariat use have been for off-label left atrial appendage exclusion, a complex and technically demanding cardiac procedure that theoretically may reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who are unable or unwilling to take blood-thinning medications.
“The 510(k) clearance protocol is providing a regulatory loophole that allows manufacturers to avoid full safety and efficacy testing of devices cleared for one purpose but used in practice for another higher-risk application,” said Giri. “In addition to the Lariat, this issue could be important for other devices used in complex procedures that have been cleared through the 510(k) pathway.”
The authors conducted a systematic review of published reports and an analytical review of the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. For the systematic review, the investigators searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library for any reports of outcomes associated with the use of the Lariat device for left atrial appendage exclusion. They found seven cases of an urgent need for cardiac surgery after use of the device (2.3% of the 309 procedures reviewed) and one death (0.3%), with an overall procedural success rate of 90.3%. The analytic review of the FDA MAUDE database identified five adverse-event reports that noted death and another 23 reports of cases necessitating urgent cardiac surgery.
“The Lariat is an ingenious piece of engineering for closing the left atrial appendage, but ingenuity does not guarantee safety and efficacy,” Giri added. “The Lariat must be assessed as a device for left atrial appendage exclusion with randomized, controlled trials before widespread use is adopted by the medical community.”
Sources: Perelman School of Medicine; May 4, 2015; and JAMA Internal Medicine; May 4, 2015.