You are here

Burnout Hurts Doctors and Is Bad for Patients –– So What’s to Be Done?

Physicians’ core responsibility is to their patients, not to government or hospitals, editorial says

The prevalence of burnout in medicine appears to be high, according to an editorial published on the Conversation website. In a 2012 study, 46% of physicians reported at least one symptom of burnout. Moreover, burnout is more common among physicians than among other highly educated groups, the editorial says.

Dr. Christina Maslach, a psychologist and co-author of the book The Truth About Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It (Jossey-Bass, 2000), and her colleagues have identified the components of burnout, including exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy (the sense that one’s efforts are not making a difference).

They call the opposite state engagement. Engaged physicians operate with a high energy level, a strong sense of involvement, and a conviction that their work makes a difference.

According to the editorial, there is little doubt that burnout among physicians is a problem. For one thing, it adversely affects work performance. It is also associated with poor health, including higher rates of stress-related diseases. It is even linked to cognitive impairments, such as reduced attention levels and memory deficits.

Moreover, being cared for by a burned-out physician is bad for patients, the editorial says. For example, burnout is associated with lower patient-satisfaction levels, longer post-surgical recovery times, and increased rates of physician-reported errors.

Today, medical practices, hospitals, and medical schools are paying more attention to burnout. When it comes to understanding burnout and what can be done about it, the metaphor of a candle offers some important insights.

To generate light, a candle first needs fuel. Physicians’ passion for medicine is fueled by many things, but perhaps the most important of all is the opportunity to care for patients. People go into medicine because they want to help others. As physicians feel that they are spending an increasing proportion of their time on activities that do not help patients, they are more likely to find themselves running on fumes.

One study at a Johns Hopkins-affiliated hospital showed that internal medicine residents were spending on average of only 8 minutes per day with each patient, but several hours interacting with hospital information systems. Many patients know what it is like to have a physician spend more time looking at a computer screen than at them, the editorial notes.

A candle also needs oxygen, which may be likened to the opportunity to make a meaningful difference in the lives of the patients for whom physicians care. To make such a difference, physicians need to know that patients are benefiting from their efforts.

Unfortunately, physicians today are often being evaluated by criteria that do not necessarily reflect patient benefit, the editorial says. These criteria include throughput (a term derived from manufacturing), revenue, and compliance with policies and procedures. Physicians may be retained, promoted, and compensated according to the number of patients they see or the number of procedures they perform, and not so much on the quality of care they provide to individual patients. In many cases, the use of such criteria may actually undermine the difference physicians are able to make. For example, it may pressure them to practice at a rate so high that they no longer have time to get to know their patients.

A candle also needs heat, and many physicians feel that the warmth of medicine is being sucked away by organizational, economic, and political forces that tend to treat patients in aggregate, rather than as individual human beings.

If there is a spark in clinical medicine, it tends to arise from the relationship between an individual patient and an individual physician. When that relationship is short-circuited, it is only natural that physicians’ ardor for their profession diminishes.

According to the editorial, if the profession of medicine is to remain healthy and patients are to enjoy high-quality care, it is vital that health care leaders grasp the importance of strong patient–physician relationships, as embodied in medicine’s foundational document, the Hippocratic Oath. Although perhaps 2,500 years old, the Hippocratic Oath makes abundantly clear that the physician’s core responsibility is not to the government, health insurance companies, or hospitals and health systems, but to the patients whom they treat.

Source: Medical Xpress; April 6, 2015.

Recent Headlines

Despite older, sicker patients, mortality rate fell by a third in 10 years
Study finds fewer than half of trials followed the law
WHO to meet tomorrow to decide on international public heath emergency declaration
Study of posted prices finds wild variations and missing data
Potential contamination could lead to supply chain disruptions
Acasti reports disappointing results for a second Omega-3-based drug
Declining lung cancer mortality helped fuel the progress
Kinase inhibitor targets tumors with a PDGFRA exon 18 mutation
Delayed surgery reduces benefits; premature surgery raises risks