You are here

Patients Don’t Understand Risks of Unnecessary Antibiotics for Viral Infections

Many think ‘bugs are bugs,’ study finds

Over-prescription of antibiotics is a major factor driving one of the biggest public health concerns today: antibiotic resistance. In a new study, research led by George Washington University in Washington, D.C., suggests that public-health educational materials may not address the misconceptions that shape why patients expect antibiotics, driving physicians to prescribe them more.

The research was published in the October 2014 edition of Medical Decision Making.

Researchers at George Washington, Cornell, and Johns Hopkins universities surveyed 113 patients in an urban hospital to test their understanding of antibiotics. They discovered a widespread misconception: patients may want antibiotics even if they know that, if they have a viral infection, the drugs will not make them better. These patients believe that taking the medication will not worsen their condition — and that the risk of taking unnecessary antibiotics does not outweigh the possibility that they may help.

“Patients figure that taking antibiotics can’t hurt and just might make them improve. When they come in for treatment, they are usually feeling pretty bad and looking for anything that will make them feel better. These patients might know that there is, in theory, a risk of side effects when taking antibiotics, but they interpret that risk as essentially nil,” said lead author David A. Broniatowski, PhD.

Contrary to these patients’ beliefs, there are risks associated with taking unnecessary antibiotics, such as secondary infections and allergic reactions.

“More than half of the patients we surveyed already knew that antibiotics don’t work against viruses, but they still agreed with taking antibiotics just in case,” Broniatowski said. “We need to fight fire with fire. If patients think that antibiotics can’t hurt, we can’t just focus on telling them that they probably have a virus. We need to let them know that antibiotics can have some pretty bad side effects, and that they will definitely not help cure a viral infection.”

The researchers found that most educational tools used to communicate the dangers of taking unnecessary antibiotics focus on the differences between bacteria and viruses — the idea that “germs are germs” — but do not address patients’ widespread “why not take a risk” belief.

While the study was small, the results signal the need for a shift in the way health care officials educate patients and caretakers, Broniatowski said. He urged members of the public- health community to reconsider their communication tactics and adjust educational materials to address patients’ concerns and beliefs.

In the future, Broniatowski and his colleagues hope to test these communication strategies in a clinical setting and, ultimately, to reduce the rate of over-prescription.

Sources: George Washington University; December 15, 2014; and Medical Decision Making; October 20, 2014.

Recent Headlines

Scenesse is new treatment for people with rare, painful light sensitivity disease
Humira, Rituxan top list of drugs that added $5.1 billion to nation's health care bill
Lower court rulings cleared the way for generic versions of the MS drug
Maryland man wins lawsuit that alleges that the company's antipsychotic caused his gynecomastia
Antidepressants, ADHD meds are also used to self-poison
Data show PTC Therapeutics drug preserves lung function
U.S. maintains measles elimination status as NY outbreak ebbs
Study lists steps that could save close to $300 billion a year
While many victims used THC, the cause remains elusive