You are here

Experimental Drug Fails Breast Cancer Trial

Phase II study of imetelstat terminated because of survival data (Sept. 10)

Geron Corporation, based in Menlo Park, Calif., announced on September 10 that, on the basis of an unplanned interim analysis, it is discontinuing its randomized phase II study of imetelstat in metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer because median progression-free survival (PFS) in the imetelstat arm was shorter than in the comparator arm.

The company also announced that it is continuing its randomized phase 2 study of imetelstat in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, although a separate interim analysis of the NSCLC study suggested a modest trend of efficacy in favor of the imetelstat arm, the prespecified success criteria in this trial are unlikely to be met, and, as a consequence, it is doubtful that Geron will take imetelstat forward into phase III development for NSCLC.

The study in metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer was a randomized, controlled study of 166 patients in which imetelstat in combination with paclitaxel was compared with paclitaxel alone. The primary efficacy endpoint was an estimate of PFS.

In this trial, a scheduled periodic review conducted by Geron's internal safety-monitoring committee reported a greater number of deaths and a greater number of patients discontinuing paclitaxel in the imetelstat arm compared with the control arm. An unplanned interim analysis of efficacy showed a median PFS of 6.2 months for patients receiving treatment with imetelstat in combination with paclitaxel compared with 8.0 months for patients receiving paclitaxel alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.62; P = 0.028). Although the absolute number of deaths was higher in the imetelstat arm (16 vs. 10), there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. Based on these findings, Geron has discontinued this trial.

The trial protocol allowed reductions or delays in the dosing of paclitaxel consistent with the approved labeling, and there was an increased number of such occurrences in the imetelstat arm of the study. A series of analyses suggested that reductions of paclitaxel dose intensity in the imetelstat arm were probably responsible for the difference in PFS.

To understand the potential effect of imetelstat in the metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer study independent of reduced paclitaxel dosing, and to ensure that treatment with the drug was not accelerating disease progression in the NSCLC trial, Geron conducted an unplanned interim safety and efficacy analysis of the data from its randomized phase II trial in NSCLC, in which imetelstat is being administered as a single agent. The advanced NSCLC study of 116 patients is evaluating imetelstat maintenance treatment following platinum-based induction chemotherapy compared with observation. In this study imetelstat is being administered at a higher dose and frequency than in the HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer study.

The interim analysis of the NSCLC study suggested a modest but not statistically significant trend in PFS in favor of the imetelstat arm (HR: 0.78). Median PFS for the imetelstat-treated arm was 2.8 months compared with 2.6 months for the observation-only arm. Thus, no evidence was found that imetelstat was accelerating disease progression in this study, which is continuing as planned.

The data from the interim analysis of the NSCLC trial also suggested that imetelstat was not contributing to the increased risk of disease progression independent of reduced paclitaxel dosing in the metastatic breast cancer study. Therefore, at this time, Geron is not aware of any factors responsible for the shorter PFS in the imetelstat treatment arm of the metastatic breast cancer study other than the reduced paclitaxel dose intensity.

The company reports that its plans for further development of imetelstat in hematologic malignancies have not been adversely affected by these results. The company is evaluating imetelstat in two hematologic malignancies: essential thrombocythemia (ET) and multiple myeloma. Using biomarkers, these two studies are designed to evaluate whether inhibiting telomerase will selectively reduce the proliferation of the malignant progenitor cells responsible for these diseases. In the ET trial, the company is also evaluating clinical and hematological responses. Geron expects to release top-line results from these studies in the fourth quarter of this year.

For more information, visit the Geron Corporation Web site.

Recent Headlines

Disrupting Gut Microbiome Could Be Key
Drug Boosts Levels of Natural Endocannabinoids
Judicious Use of Antibiotics May Not Be Enough To Defeat Bacteria That Carry On By Going Into a Dormant State
KRAS Oncogene Is a Problematic Target So Researchers Are Trying Workdarounds
Understanding Neural Ensembles in Infralimbic Cortex May Lead To Improved Addiction Treatment
Vitamin E Found in Samples Around the Country
Study Links Them to Premature Death
Nag With Texting and a ‘Winners Circle’
How Serotonin and Fluoxetine Affect Microbiota Residing in the Gut