You are here
Misidentification of Alphanumeric Symbols Plays a Role in Errors
Mistaken letters and numerals play a large part in errors when reading handwritten drug names, doses, and directions. Cursive writing is most susceptible to illegibility and carries the greatest vulnerability to error, as the various symbols often lack distinctiveness.1–3 A few examples of misinterpreted alpha-numeric symbols that happened when reading handwritten medication orders follow.
Lowercase letter “l” mistaken as numeral “1”
A nurse misread an order for 2 mg of “AMARYL” (glimepiride, Sanofi-Aventis U.S.) as 12 mg (
In another case, a nurse transcribed an order for lisinopril 2.5 mg daily by copying the prescriber’s orders that were previously on hold. However, she misread the dose as 12.5 mg daily (
Uppercase letter “L” mistaken as uppercase letter “I”
While reviewing an order for a new patient, a pharmacist read “IODINE” in the space for allergies. Another pharmacist thought the allergy was “LODINE” (etodolac, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals). The pharmacist contacted the patient’s physician who identified Lodine as the allergy.2 The patient was not harmed, but failure to document the correct allergy could have risked serious harm.
Uppercase and lowercase letter “U” mistaken as numerals “0” or “4”
Another common mix–up between letters and numerals involves an uppercase “U” or lowercase “u” that has been mistaken as the numeral “0” or “4” if the downward tail on either letter is too long. The handwritten order in
Uppercase letter “Z” mistaken as numeral “2”
A handwritten order for hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg daily was mistaken as hydrocortisone 250 mg. An error-prone abbreviation for hydrochlorothiazide was used—HCTZ—and the dose was written very close to the abbreviation—“HCTZ50.” In this case, the handwritten letter “Z” was misread as the numeral “2.”
Numeral “0” (written as “Ø”) mistaken as numeral “4,” “9,” or “6”
A physician documented a handwritten null sign next to a dose prompt for a basal rate on a patient-controlled analgesia order form. Two nurses misread the null sign as the number “4.” The patient received a basal infusion of morphine 4 mg per hour and became unresponsive. The patient was found in cardiac arrest; resuscitation efforts ensued but the patient suffered anoxic brain injury. During investigation of the event, several other orders with a null sign revealed that the symbol could be mistaken as a “4” or “9,” especially if the tail of the slash mark through the circle is long, or a “6,” especially if the circle is not closed above the slash mark through the circle.
Uppercase letter “S” mistaken as uppercase letter “L”
A handwritten order for “SORIATANE” (acitretin, Stiefel Laboratories) 25 mg was mistaken as “LOXITANE” (loxapine, Watson Pharma) 25 mg. The cursive uppercase letters “S” and “L” and the cursive lowercase letters “ri” and “xi” looked very similar, leading to a potentially harmful error.
Electronic medical records, computer-generated records, or electronic medication administration records (eMARs), and computerized prescriber order entry can help overcome many problems with handwritten communication. Use of such technology has been growing swiftly in hospitals, thanks in large part to meaningful use incentives. However, even typed, computer-generated, or electronic prescriber orders and transcriptions may not prevent confusion among certain alpha-numeric symbols. For example, a clearly typed prescription for 25 mcg of LEVOXYL (levothyroxine, Jones Pharma) could still be misread as 125 mcg if it appears without proper spacing as “Levoxyl25 mcg,” especially because both strengths are available for this medication.
To cite another example, those familiar with computer-generated passwords know how easy it is to misidentify a lower case letter “l” in a password (or email address) as the numeral “1,” or the letter “O” as a numeral “0.” Information that contains both numerals and letters—including a medication order—is particularly prone to errors.
Risk Factors Leading to Confusion
The probability of confusing one alpha-numeric symbol with another is largely dependent on the number of distinguishing factors between the look–alike pair. The fewer the distinguishing factors, the greater the risk of confusion. For example, the letter “O” and numeral “0” are at high risk for confusion because there are no discernable factors between them.
It is also more likely for an alpha numeric symbol with more distinguishing factors to be misread as its look–alike counterpart with fewer distinguishing elements.5 Take the number pair “8” and “3,” for instance. If the features of these numerals are segmented into rectilinear configurations (like the numbers on digital clocks), the numeral “8” would touch upon all seven segments, and the numeral “3” would touch upon five of the seven segments (
Context is also a risk factor. While context can sometimes enhance symbol recognition, it can also detract from recognition. For example, if you saw a “Z,” an “I,” or an “O” amid an array of numerals, you could easily mistake the symbols as the numerals “2,” “1,” or “0.” In addition, word recognition software often has difficulty distinguishing “L” and “I,” “Z” and “2,” and other look–alike symbols.
Thus, it is not surprising that research conducted by Bell Laboratories found that some alphanumeric symbols are more vulnerable than others to misidentification. 1 The symbols “l” and “1,” “O” and “0,” “Z” and “2,” and “1” and “7” accounted for more than half of the errors caused by symbol misidentification in the study.
Safe Practice Recommendations
The characteristics of alphanumeric symbols that form each word or number determine the accuracy and speed at which material may be read or identified. Clarity around the following three characteristics allows readers to focus on the message instead of the mechanics of reading:6
- Visibility—The quality of an alphanumeric symbol that makes it separately discernable from its surroundings.
- Legibility—The attribute of an alphanumeric symbol that makes it possible for each character to be recognized.
- Readability—The quality that makes possible the recognition of the information content of the material.
There are various ways to promote these characteristics in written communications.
Use lowercase or mixed-case letters
Avoid using all uppercase letters. The brain recognizes written words by the shape of the word or its “coastline.”7 Coastline refers to the shape of a word formed by the boundaries of its letters. When using all uppercase letters, a word’s shape or coastline is not offered as a visual clue to aid in word recognition.7 While there are several hand written lowercase letters that are difficult to distinguish (
Encourage prescribers to clearly print handwritten orders, and encourage nurses to use printing when transcribing orders. Practitioners may save time by using cursive writing, but the time saved needs to be weighed against the risk of errors and the tremendous waste of staff time when poorly handwritten orders must be interpreted.
Provide lightly lined order forms
Lines on forms for handwritten orders should be lightly shaded, making them visible to prescribers, yet still light enough to prevent interference with symbols—particularly “T,” “7,” and “I,” or “E,” “F,” and “L”—when reading handwritten and faxed orders.
Use symbolic differentiation carefully
Symbolic differentiation may be another way to distinctively convey a symbol’s meaning.1 For example, the numeral “7” can be written with a bar through it to prevent confusion with the numeral “1.” Similarly, the letter “Z” with a bar through it can prevent confusion with the numeral “2.” However, avoid using a symbolic null sign (Ø) in place of the numeral “0,” as it is prone to confusion.
Be selective about font and typeface
Sans serif fonts are easier to read on computers, although a Roman-style serif font is easier to read for printed text.7 The Roman-style serif font (this font) is widely used, very legible, and provides high discrimination between alpha numeric characters. But serif fonts more elaborate than this style should not be used.6 The preferred font size is about 20–25 minutes of arc, which is equivalent to a 10- to 14-point font size.6 A study comparing typefaces and font sizes found that, at the 10-point size, Verdana (this font) or Tahoma (this font) was preferred; at the 12-point size, Arial (this font) or Courier (this font) was preferred; and at the 14-point size, Comic Sans (this font) was preferred.7 Times New Roman (this font) and Arial (this font) were read the fastest. Out of all the fonts, Arial (this font) and Courier (this font) were found to be the most legible.
Avoid italics and underlining
Italics or underlining should be avoided, as they make it more difficult for the reader to recognize the word shape. However, italics for words or clauses may be used according to publishing guidelines (e.g., Latin terms, journal titles, bacteria nomenclature).
Ensure proper spacing
Allow proper space between the individual letters of a drug name and between the drug name and the dose on all hand written prescriptions, printed prescriptions, and preprinted order sets, and electronic formats such as computer screens, computer-generated medication labels, and eMARs, printed forms/order sets, and shelf labels. Also provide enough space between each line of text so that tails, loops, and bars of letters do not interfere with the letters in words in lines above and below the text.
Ensure drug and dose make sense
When reading an order, determine if the dose is within a recommended range and available in the strength prescribed. If it is not, follow-up with the prescriber may be necessary to clarify the order. Keep in mind that the context in which the order is read may not be helpful in all cases to properly identify alphanumeric symbols; however, in the case of medication orders, context may help raise a red flag if the dose seems too high or too low.
Figures and Table
Real-World Examples: Misread Handwritten Medication Orders
A, A 2-mg dose of Amaryl was misread as 12 mg. B, The final “l” in lisinopril was seen as the numeral “1,” making the dose 12.5 mg instead of 2.5 mg. C, A 25-mg dose of sildenafil was misread as 125 mg. D, The Novolog dose of “5 units” was mistaken as “54 units” because the letter “u” in units was misread as the numeral “4.”
The numeral “8” touches all seven possible elements that could help distinguish it from the numeral “3.” The numeral “3” touches only five elements (1, 3, 4, 6, and 7).
Examples of Commonly Confused Letters and Numerals
|Lowercase Letter–Lowercase Letter||Uppercase Letter–Uppercase Letter||Uppercase Letter–Numeral (continued)|
|g and q||T and I||O and 0|
|p and n||D and O||B and 8|
|m and n||C and G||D and 0|
|y and z||L and I||S and 5|
|u and v||M and N||S and 8|
|c and e||P and B||Y and 5|
|cursive l and cursive b||F and R||Z and 7|
|cursive i and cursive e||U and O||T and 7|
|cursive a and cursive o||U and V||U and 0|
|E and F||U and 4|
|l and 1||V and W|
|b and 6||X and Y||0 and 8|
|o and 0||cursive S and cursive L||3 and 9|
|g and 9||3 and 8|
|q and 9||G and 6||4 and 9|
|F and 7||5 and 8|
|I and l||Z and 2||5 and 3|
|Q and 2||6 and 8|
|7 and 1|
- Nierenberg GI. Do It Right the First Time: A Short Guide to Learning From Your Most Memorable Errors, Mistakes, and Blunders
1st edNew York, New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1996;154–162.
- Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Misidentification of alphanumeric characters. ISMP Medication Safety Alert, Community/Ambulatory Care Edition 2003;2;(1):3
- Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Misidentification of alphanumeric symbols in both handwritten and computer-generated information. ISMP Medication Safety Alert 2009;14;(13):1–2.
- Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. What the “l” is the dose?. PA PSRS Patient Saf Advis 2006;3;(3):19–20.
- Keren G, Baggen S. Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. Percept Psychophys 1981;29;(3):234–246.
- Kelly MJ. Preliminary human factors guidelines for traffic management centers. Federal Highway Administration Publication FHWA-JPO-99-042 July 1999; Available at: www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/99042/99042.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2017
- Oberoi A. How typography affects readers.
AdpushupBlog December 6, 2013; Available at: www.adpushup.com/blog/how-typography-affects-readers. Accessed August 10, 2017