You are here
Overview of Insulin and Non-Insulin Delivery Devices In the Treatment of Diabetes
Diabetes affects 20.9 million people in the U.S. and 347 million people worldwide.1,2 It is estimated that one in three American adults will have diabetes by 2050.1,3 Serious complications, such as blindness, kidney failure, and amputations, have been associated with chronic hyperglycemia.3 Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death worldwide.2,3
Approximately 5% of diabetes cases in the U.S. are classified as type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), which requires insulin therapy because of β-cell destruction. Of all diabetes cases, 90% to 95% are classified as type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which results from a progressive insulin secretory defect against a background of insulin resistance.4,5 T2DM is more common in minority populations, the elderly, obese persons, and those with sedentary lifestyles.6,7
In 2011, 17.7 million Americans were being treated with insulin or oral medications.7,8 Antidiabetic agents were among the top five classes of medications in 2012, accounting for $22 billion in pharmaceutical sales. These agents included eight insulin products (primarily insulin pen delivery devices) and two non-insulin injectable delivery devices (Byetta and Victoza).8,9
A position statement from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), released in 2012, and a comprehensive diabetes management algorithm from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) have championed a patient-centered approach to selecting appropriate initial therapy for T2DM.10–12 Both the ADA and the EASD emphasize the use of basal insulin, whereas the AACE consensus statement gives priority to the use of rapid-onset, long-acting insulin analogs and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) because of their positive efficacy and safety profiles and their low risk of hypoglycemia.11,12
This article reviews the available insulin and non-insulin delivery devices and their place in current therapy.
Guidelines from the ADA and the AACE highlight the importance of early and aggressive treatment of diabetes to achieve and maintain glucose levels comparable with those of nondiabetic patients in order to prevent chronic complications.
Insulin preparations (
Health care providers, however, are reluctant to prescribe insulin because of the need for frequent dose adjustments, the potential for hypoglycemia, and the time required to educate patients regarding insulin administration. Patients, in turn, are often reluctant to use insulin because of their fear of injections, their belief that insulin is difficult to administer, and their perception that insulin preparations have adverse side effects.14 These barriers to treatment may be overcome by the use of insulin-delivery devices.
For all patients with T1DM and some with T2DM, an ideal insulin regimen mimics the body’s own insulin-release pattern (basal–bolus dosing).13 Intermediate-acting insulin (i.e., neutral protamine Hagedorn [NPH] insulin) and long-acting insulin analogs (i.e., insulin detemir and insulin glargine) provide basal insulin coverage, whereas short-acting regular human insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogs provide prandial coverage.13
Insulin-delivery pens eliminate the need to draw up insulin, which allows more convenient administration compared with syringes. An insulin pen looks like a large fountain pen. The pen is prefilled with insulin, and the only preparation required is attaching the needle. There are two basic types of pens: disposable and reusable.
Disposable Insulin Pens
Disposable insulin-delivery pens do not require a cartridge or the installation of an insulin reservoir, and they are discarded when empty or when the use date has expired. Three U.S companies market disposable insulin pens: Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, and Novo Nordisk. Eli Lilly manufactures the KwikPen for Humalog, Humalog Mix 50/50, and Humalog Mix 75/25; Sanofi-Aventis manufactures the SoloSTAR for Lantus and Apidra; and Novo Nordisk manufactures the FlexPen for Novolog and Novolog Mix 70/30, as well as the FlexTouch for Levemir. Each of these pens holds 300 units (3 mL) of insulin and delivers 60 to 80 units per dose in 1-unit increments. The FlexPen and the KwikPen deliver up to 60 units per dose, and the SoloSTAR and the FlexTouch deliver up to 80 units per dose.15
The following instructions for use are common among devices:16
Reusable Insulin Pens
Reusable insulin-delivery pens require the patient to load insulin cartridges into the pen. The pen requires only the replacement of cartridges and needles, and can be used safely for several years. Reusable pens are available from Owen Mumford, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. They are used only with rapid-acting insulin preparations.
The following instructions for use are typical:17
Features of Insulin-Delivery Pens
Insulin-delivery pen devices have special features that may influence a patient’s preference. For example, Humalog insulin 3-mL cartridges are available for use with the HumaPen Memoir and the Luxura HD.
The HumaPen Memoir is an electronic pen with a dose memory that allows patients to set the date and time and to record the last 16 doses administered. The device can deliver insulin in doses from 1 to 60 units. It was discontinued by Eli Lilly in March 2011; however, if a patient has this pen, it can still be used with the Humalog cartridges.
The Luxura HD can deliver from 1 to 30 units in half-unit increments, allowing more precise measurement. This can be an advantage for children or for a patient trying to cover the amount of carbohydrates consumed per meal.17
The NovoPen Junior is available in two bright colors. This pen features a dosing window and a dial dosing mechanism. It can deliver from 1 to 35 units of insulin in half-unit increments, making it an attractive option for children. The NovoPen 3 also features a dosing window and a dial dosing mechanism. This device delivers 2 to 70 units of insulin in 1-unit increments. Both pens were discontinued in March 2014 but are still available for use with Novolog Penfill 3-mL cartridges.16
Patients may find disposable pens more convenient than reusable pens because the user does not have to be trained on how to install and replace cartridges. Moreover, the low injection force of disposable pens requires less thumb button pressure to effectively deliver a complete dose. Less thumb pressure makes disposable pens easier to use, especially for older adults and those with dexterity problems.
One study found that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were preferable in terms of usability (i.e., the ability to prepare the pen and to inject insulin into a receptacle) compared with Humulin and Humalog.18
The FlexTouch is a new prefilled insulin pen without a pushbutton extension at any dose setting. It is currently available only with insulin detemir (Levemir). It only requires a light touch to deliver the insulin dose and has an audible click confirmation when the dose is delivered.16 In a study, the insulin mechanism of the FlexTouch pen resulted in a significantly lower injection force when compared with that of both the Solostar and the KwikPen at all injection speeds.19
All insulin pens and insulin cartridges are stable until the expiration date on the label if they are stored unopened in a refrigerator. Once the package has been opened, the length of days that the pens and cartridges remain stable varies based on the insulin preparation.
Stability of Insulin Pens
Diabetic patients may use several types of insulin per day. Most pens are color-coded; however, they still look very similar, and patients need to ensure that they do not accidently use the incorrect insulin.
Place in Therapy
Insulin-delivery pens offer enhanced convenience and controlled dosing. Many diabetic patients find that these devices are more convenient than syringes because they eliminate the need for drawing up a dose.20 The traditional vial-and-syringe method of insulin administration involves several steps, including drawing up the correct amount of air into the syringe; injecting the air into the vial; drawing the correct dose of insulin from the vial into the syringe; and injecting.
Studies have shown that patients using the traditional vial-and-syringe method of delivery have a higher risk of drawing up an incorrect insulin dose, with a relative error of approximately 19% in the accuracy of dosing.20 Pen devices have a dial that must be turned to select the correct dose, as opposed to reading the syringe. Moreover, these devices click as the patient selects each unit, which may be helpful for patients with impaired vision. Pen devices are also more accurate than syringes in measuring insulin at very low doses (i.e., 1 or 2 units).20
A randomized, open-label, crossover study comparing a pre-filled, disposable pen with the vial-and-syringe method found that 73% of the patients using the pen were confident in the accuracy of insulin doses compared with 19% of those using syringes.23 Furthermore, 85% of the pen group considered the devices to be more discreet for use in public than syringes. These patients also showed statistically significant improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin values during the study. Overall, 74% of patients found that the pen device was easier to use than the vial-and-syringe method of insulin delivery.
Another study evaluated patients’ satisfaction with the method by which insulin was administered before hospital discharge.24 Significantly more patients using pen devices than those using syringes reported that they would continue administering insulin at home by the same method. The study concluded that if patients are comfortable and confident with their insulin-delivery device, they are more likely to adhere to their insulin therapy, resulting in fewer hypoglycemic episodes and reduced associated health care costs.
Nurses also prefer insulin-pen devices over syringes for use in hospitalized patients. A satisfaction survey was conducted among 54 registered nurses in a community hospital after the implementation of pen-device use on two medical–surgical floors.25 Most of the nurses (70% to 80%) felt that insulin pens were more convenient and easier to use than syringes.
Children with diabetes often have more-positive feelings about using the pens as well. Syringes can be associated with pain and with illicit drug use, which is a concern for young people. Pen devices are easy to use and provide accurate dosing for young patients who are busy with sports and social activities. Moreover, the lower insulin doses that are commonly used in children are easier to measure with pen devices.26
Cost and Formulary Considerations
Insulin pens are generally more expensive than syringes and insulin vials (
A retrospective analysis involving 486 adults with a diagnosis of T2DM found a significant decrease in hypoglycemia associated with emergency department and physician visits among patients who switched from syringes to insulin-pen delivery devices.27 Similarly, Lee et al reported significant reductions in annual hypoglycemia-attributable costs with pen devices, and this cost savings represented 57% of the total savings in the use of diabetes-related health care resources.20
A study by Ward et al evaluated the switch from vial/syringe insulin administration to insulin injector pens among more than 4,000 patients with T2DM in a specialty clinic and hospital. The total insulin costs for the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods were $124,181 and $60,655, respectively.28
There is ongoing concern, however, regarding the safety of insulin pens for routine inpatient use. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) issued a statement in February 2013 advising hospitals to re-examine the use of pen devices, with a strong recommendation to move away from insulin pens.29 According to the ISMP, more than 700 patients at a New York hospital might have been exposed to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B or C because of the reuse of insulin pens in multiple patients. Another New York hospital reported that 1,915 insulin-dependent patients were exposed to bloodborne pathogens because of improper sharing of insulin pens between November 2009 and January 2013.29
Insulin Pump Therapy
The main purposes of insulin-pump therapy are to maintain long-term glycemic control and to minimize hypoglycemia compared with multiple daily insulin injections. It has been suggested that fluctuations in blood glucose levels are the cause of various diabetic complications, including neuropathy and retinopathy.9
Insulin pumps provide a constant subcutaneous infusion of rapid-acting insulin analogues or regular insulin to mimic normal pancreatic insulin release. Doses can be adjusted to provide a basal level of insulin between meals as well as to allow bolus delivery with food. The insulin is infused from a reservoir into the body through a catheter that has been inserted into the tissue via a needle. The catheter does not need to be disconnected from the needle unless the patient is bathing or swimming. The needle should be changed once every three days, and the patient should rotate the needle’s injection sites.22
Insulin delivery from a pump is more exact than delivery from either a syringe or a pen. With a pump, basal insulin can be adjusted in 0.25-unit increments and bolus insulin can be adjusted in 0.05-unit increments, depending on the individual device. This more-exact dosing can help prevent fluctuations in blood glucose.30
All available insulin pumps have similar modes of operation; however, specific features may influence patient preference. Varying features include the size of the reservoir; the type and size of the screen; basal and bolus delivery increments; the device’s compatibility with blood glucose meters; the specificity of bolus calculations; the ease of programming; data downloading and uploading options; and history reports.23
The Medtronic Paradigm Revel, for example, provides high and low blood glucose alerts. The Tandem Diabetes T-Slim is the only touch-screen insulin pump available in the U.S. The Animas Ping stores up to 500 foods from the CalorieKing database on its meter, making carbohydrate counting easy.
Many pumps allow patients to administer a bolus dose from the meter based on the blood glucose reading.31 All insulin pumps except the OmniPod require the use of a separate infusion set, which consists of thin plastic tubing connected to a stainless steel or flexible Teflon cannula, with a plastic connector that joins the tubing to the cannula. The cannula is inserted subcutaneously at a 30- to 90-degree angle and at a depth of 6 to 8 mm.30
The OmniPod is a wireless insulin pump that delivers insulin without shots or tubing. It is waterproof, so the patient can wear it while bathing or swimming. The OmniPod inserts automatically with the push of a button and uses a Personal Diabetes Manager (PDM) for dosing. The PDM has a built-in FreeStyle blood glucose meter, which eliminates the need to carry a meter or to transfer results. This device also contains a bolus calculator, which recommends doses based on the patient’s settings and on his or her blood glucose values.32
Insulin pumps require more patient education than is needed with other forms of insulin delivery. Extensive training is required to ensure that patients understand how to use the pump to manage their diabetes. Patients starting to use an insulin pump must be motivated to improve their glucose control and must be prepared to work closely with their health care team.
Insulin-pump therapy requires frequent monitoring of blood glucose (up to six to eight times a day). Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) rarely occurs if patients monitor their blood glucose readings regularly; however, if a pump malfunctions, DKA can develop quickly because of the short half-life of rapid-acting insulin. Patients should always have basal insulin on hand, either in a vial or a pen, in the event that the insulin pump cannot be used.30
Place in Therapy
According to the American Association of Diabetes Educators, pump therapy should be considered for patients who are not achieving their treatment goals (e.g., HbA1C: 7.0% to 7.5%) on current insulin treatment or in patients with severe hypoglycemia, multiple hypoglycemic events, frequent and unpredictable fluctuations in blood glucose levels, and/or the perception that diabetes management interferes with attaining their personal or professional goals.30
Cost is a key disadvantage of insulin-pump therapy. Most pumps and supplies, such as tubing, syringes, cartridges, and dressings, can cost more than $5,000. The infusion set and catheters must be purchased regularly for as long as the pump is used.31
Most insurance companies will cover the cost of the pump after prior authorization, especially for T1DM patients. It is more difficult for T2DM patients to receive insurance coverage for the pump. Moreover, if a patient’s plan covers the pump, the plan usually pays for up to 80% of the cost, leaving the patient to pay the remaining 20%, which can be costly.33
Most patients change their insulin pumps once every five years, which accounts for most of the cost; the maintenance costs for insulin pumps are not much more than those for insulin-pen devices. When equipment costs are added to the cost of supplies, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is only slightly more expensive than the use of insulin-pen devices on an annual basis.33 There is no evidence that insulin-pump therapy improves glycemic control; however, it appears to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.33
The V-Go (Valeritas) is a disposable insulin-delivery device designed to control blood glucose in adults with T2DM. Instructions on its use follow:34
- Patients fill the device with U-100 rapid-acting insulin using the EZ Fill system. The EZ Fill system transfers insulin from the vial to the V-Go device. An EZ Fill is provided with each 30-day supply of devices. The EZ Fill is used to fill the V-Go on each day of use. The V-Go device should not be filled with insulin and stored for later use.
- The V-Go is applied to a part of the body where the device can be reached and viewed, such as the abdomen.
- The patient pushes the needle button to insert the needle and to begin the flow of insulin at a continuous basal rate.
- For bolus delivery, the patient presses the Bolus Ready button, and then presses the Bolus Delivery button to release the bolus dose of 2 units. Both steps must be repeated until the patient receives the desired bolus dose.
- To remove and dispose of the device, the patient presses the Needle Release button. The needle locks in place and cannot be redeployed. The device is then removed and discarded. (This must be done every 24 hours.)
To determine the insulin dose and basal rate with the V-Go device, the manufacturer recommends starting with either the patient’s total daily insulin dose multiplied by 0.7 or 0.75, or with the patient’s body weight (in kilograms) multiplied by 0.5. Half of the total daily insulin dose is the basal rate, and the other half is the bolus dosing, divided among meals.
The V-Go device is available as V-Go 20 (20 units/24 hours), V-Go 30 (30 units/24 hours), and V-Go 40 (40 units/24 hours). The bolus dosing can be administered only in 2-unit increments (one push = 2 units) up to 36 units (18 bolus doses per day). Patients have to plan their days so that they have enough insulin for each meal.34
Place in Therapy
The V-Go device does not require extra needles or supplies, and it can work while the patient is showering, sweating, or swimming. In addition, it is more discreet for patients than a pen or a syringe, since patients can give themselves a bolus dose through their clothes. This convenience may improve both adherence and glycemic control.
Twenty-three patients participated in a 12-week retrospective analysis of glycemic control with a V-Go device. The mean HbA1C value decreased significantly from baseline (from 8.8% to 7.6%; P = 0.005) during use of the V-Go device, but returned to 8.2% after treatment.35
The V-Go device is covered by most third-party plans as a pharmacy benefit; however, it may require prior authorization, or the patient may be responsible for a higher co-pay, depending on the plan. For some insurance companies, the device is covered under the medical benefit.35
Afrezza (MannKind) is a rapid-acting inhaled insulin indicated to improve glycemic control in adults at least 18 years of age with T1DM or T2DM; however, it is not a substitute for long-acting insulin. In patients with T1DM, Afrezza must be used in combination with long-acting insulin. It is considered an ultra-rapid-acting insulin because the onset of action is 12 to 15 minutes, with a peak of about 60 minutes and duration of activity of about 2.5–3 hours.36
The cartridges and inhaler should be at room temperature for 10 minutes before use. Patients should use one inhaler for multiple cartridges but should throw away that inhaler after 15 days. The instructions include the following steps:36
Afrezza is available in two strengths: 4 units (blue cartridges) and 8 units (green cartridges), both dispensed in foil packages. Each package contains two blister cards, with 15 cartridges per blister card (for a total of 30 cartridges).36
Sealed foil packages can be stored unopened in the refrigerator (36–46°F, 2–8°C) until the expiration date on the package. Opened foil packages (blister cards and strips) kept at room temperature and not refrigerated must be used within 10 days; strips that have been opened must be used within three days.36
The inhaler should be kept in a clean, dry place, with the mouthpiece covered until the next dose. It may be stored refrigerated, but must be at room temperature before use. The inhaler should be replaced every 15 days to maintain drug delivery.36
Afrezza carries a boxed warning for the risk of acute bronchospasms in patients with chronic lung disease. Acute bronchospasms have been seen in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, so Afrezza is contraindicated in these patients. Before initiating Afrezza, perform spirometry (measuring forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]) to identify potential lung disease in all patients. Afrezza causes a decline in lung function over time as measured by FEV1. Assess pulmonary function at baseline, after the first six months of therapy, and annually thereafter. If there is a decline of 20% or more in FEV1 from baseline, consider discontinuation. The use of Afrezza is not recommended in patients who smoke or who have recently stopped smoking because safety and efficacy have not been established.36
Afrezza is administered via oral inhalation using the provided inhaler once at the beginning of a meal. If a meal is skipped, then the dose is skipped.
Insulin-näive patients should start with 4 units with each meal. Mealtime insulin patients should convert 1:1, while premixed insulin patients should estimate their mealtime dose by dividing half of their total daily dose of premixed insulin equally among the three meals of the day (
Place in Therapy
Afrezza is ultra-rapid-acting mealtime inhaled insulin. It can be used to decrease the number of injections given per day, but patients must still inject their basal insulin. It can be beneficial for patients who are embarrassed to inject insulin in public. Afrezza is FDA-approved; however, it is not yet available to pharmacies and the cost is unknown.37
NON-INSULIN INJECTABLE DEVICES
Non-insulin medications available in injectable delivery systems include the GLP-1 RAs exenatide, exenatide extended release (ER), and liraglutide, and the amylin analogue pramlintide. All of these agents are administered by subcutaneous injection to avoid degradation in the gut.
Exenatide, liraglutide, and pramlintide are available as pre-filled, disposable insulin pens. Exenatide ER is an injectable suspension that is available in a single-use tray. The patient must transfer the medication from the vial to the syringe during self-injection. The FDA approved the Bydureon (exenatide ER) pen in March 2014.
To administer an injection of exenatide ER, patients perform the following steps:
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
Place in Therapy
As noted above, the GLP-1 RAs liraglutide, exenatide, and exenatide ER are available in injectable formulations. These agents are used as adjuncts to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM.38–42 GLP-1 RAs regulate glucose homeostasis by stimulating insulin release in response to the ingested glucose load. This suppresses inappropriately elevated glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying while causing negligible hypoglycemia.38–42 Although the GLP-1 RAs are not indicated for weight reduction, significant weight loss can result from the pharmacological effect of delayed gastric emptying.42
Since GLP-1 deficiency occurs early in T2DM, the AACE recommends the use of a GLP-1 RA as monotherapy after metformin in patients with HbA1C levels of less than 7.5%, and as dual therapy with metformin in those with HbA1C levels greater than 7.5%.11
Place in Therapy
Pramlintide acetate injection (Symlin, Amylin Pharmaceuticals) is a synthetic amylin analogue indicated for the adjunctive treatment of patients with T1DM who have failed to achieve desired glucose control despite optimal mealtime insulin therapy. The product is also indicated as adjunctive treatment in patients with T2DM who have failed to achieve desired glucose control despite optimal mealtime insulin therapy, with or without a concurrent sulfonylurea agent and/or metformin.
Pramlintide also increases satiety, which may result in potential weight loss from reduced caloric intake.
Amylin is secreted from pancreatic beta cells along with insulin in response to food. It helps to control post-prandial glucose by slowing gastric emptying and by preventing a post-prandial increase in plasma glucagon.
The labeling for pramlintide acetate injection includes a boxed warning regarding the potential for severe hypoglycemia, especially in patients with T1DM. This effect can be minimized with proper patient selection and with frequent monitoring of pre- and post-meal glucose, as well as with an initial 50% reduction in pre-meal doses of short-acting insulin when initiating therapy. Nausea is the most commonly reported side effect.
Pramlintide has a subcutaneous starting dose of 15 mcg, which is injected immediately before meals in patients with T2DM. For patients with T1DM, the starting dose is 60 mcg. Pre-prandial, rapid-acting, or short-acting insulin dosages, including fixed-mix insulins (e.g., 70/30), are reduced by 50%. Patients should be instructed to monitor their blood glucose levels frequently, including before and after meals and at bedtime.
The pramlintide dose is increased to the next increment (30 mcg, 45 mcg, or 60 mcg) in patients with T2DM when no clinically significant nausea has occurred for at least three days. The dose may be further increased to 120 mcg in these patients if no clinically significant nausea has occurred for three to seven days. Pramlintide dose adjustments should be made only as directed by a health care professional.
If significant nausea persists at the 45-mcg or 60-mcg dose level, the pramlintide dose should be decreased to 30 mcg. If this dose is not tolerated, the clinician should consider discontinuing pramlintide therapy. If significant nausea persists at the 120-mcg dose, then the dose should be reduced to 60 mcg.
Insulin doses should be adjusted to optimize glycemic control once the target dose of pramlintide is achieved and nausea (if experienced) has subsided. Insulin dose adjustments should be made only as directed by a health care professional.
The patient and his or her clinician should review pramlintide and insulin dose adjustments at least once a week until the target dose of pramlintide is achieved.
Pramlintide is well tolerated, and blood glucose concentrations are stable. If recurrent nausea or hypoglycemia occurs, the patient should contact his or her health care professional.
Insulin has been a mainstay of treatment for patients with T1DM and is recommended for aggressive treatment of those with T2DM. Insulin pens offer the advantages of increased adherence, safety, and efficacy compared with other delivery systems. The GLP-1 RAs are injectable non-insulin medications with a unique mechanism of action. They are cited in the 2013 AACE consensus for their efficacy, safety, and low risk of hypoglycemia in the treatment of patients with T2DM.11 However, costs are an important consideration with many of these agents.
Pharmacokinetics of Available Insulin Preparations
|Insulin aspart injection (Novolog, Novo Nordisk)||5–15 minutes||30–90 minutes||< 5 hours|
|Insulin lispro injection (Humalog, Lilly)||5–15 minutes||30–90 minutes||< 5 hours|
|Insulin glulisine injection (Apidra, Sanofi-Aventis)||5–15 minutes||30–90 minutes||< 5 hours|
|Regular||30–60 minutes||2–3 hours||5–8 hours|
|Neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin||2–4 hours||4–10 hours||10–16 hours|
|Insulin glargine injection (Lantus, Sanofi-Aventis)||2–4 hours||No peak||20–24 hours|
|Insulin detemir injection (Levemir, Novo Nordisk)||3–8 hours||No peak||6–23 hours|
|75% insulin lispro protamine suspension/25% insulin lispro injection (Humalog Mix 75/25)||5–15 minutes||Dual||10–16 hours|
|50% insulin lispro protamine suspension/50% insulin lispro injection (Humalog Mix 50/50)||5–15 minutes||Dual||10–16 hours|
|70% insulin aspart protamine suspension/30% insulin aspart injection (Novolog Mix 70/30)||5–15 minutes||Dual||10–16 hours|
|70% neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin/30% regular||30–60 minutes||Dual||10–16 hours|
Stability of Insulin-Delivery Pens
|Novolog Flexpen (aspart)||28|
|Humalog KwikPen (lispro)||28|
|Apidra Solostar (glulisine)||28|
|Intermediate-acting insulin (neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin)|
|Novolin N Pen||14|
|Humulin N Pen||14|
|Humalog Mix KwikPen 50/50||10|
|Humalog Mix KwikPen 75/25||10|
|Humulin 70/30 Pen||10|
|Novolog Mix 70/30 FlexPen||14|
|GLP-1 receptor agonists|
|Exenatide ER (Bydureon)||28|
*Once in use, all insulin pens are kept at room temperature. If a pen is kept in a refrigerator unopened, it is usable until the expiration date on the label.
ER = extended release; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1
Comparative Costs of Insulin Pens and Syringe Vials (AWP)
AWP = average wholesale price (rounded to the nearest dollar)
Converting Insulin Doses to Inhaled Insulin
|Up to 4 units||One 4-unit cartridge|
|5–8 units||One 8-unit cartridge|
|9–12 units||One 4-unit and one 8-unit cartridges|
|13–16 units||Two 8-unit cartridges|
|17–20 units||One 4-unit and two 8-unit cartridges|
|21–24 units||Three 8-unit cartridges|
|More than 24 units||Combinations of different cartridges can be used|
Comparison of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
|Dosing||Once daily||Twice daily||Weekly|
FPG: −15 to −26 mg/dL
Weight loss: 2.1 to 2.5 kg
FPG: −12 to −14 mg/dL
Weight loss: 1.3 to 1.5 kg
FPG: −20 mg/dL
|Boxed warning||Risk of thyroid C-cell tumors||Risk of thyroid C-cell tumors|
|Warnings and precautions||Pancreatitis, renal impairment, hypoglycemia||Pancreatitis, renal impairment, hypoglycemia|
|Injection sites||Abdomen, back of upper arms, or thigh||Abdomen, back of upper arms, or thigh||Abdomen, back of upper arms, or thigh|
||18 mg/3 mL (3 mL): $235||10 mcg/0.04 mL (2.4 mL): $513
5 mcg/0.02 mL (1.2mL): $513
|2 mg (1): $132|
ER = extended release; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; INR = international normalized ratio
*Average wholesale price, rounded to the nearest dollar
Comparison of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Dosing and Administration
ER = extended release
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Number (in millions) of civilian, noninstitutionalized persons with diagnosed diabetes, United States, 1980–2011 Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figpersons.htm. Accessed December 10, 2013
- World Health Organization. Diabetes October 2013;Available at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes. Accessed December 10, 2013
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet, 2011 Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2013
- American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care 2014;37;(suppl 1):S14–S80.
- American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013;36;(suppl 1):S67–S74a.
- Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Lane J, Wang P. Relationship between obesity and diabetes in a US adult population: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2006. Obes Surg 2011;21;(3):351–355.
- DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Gani M. Type 2 diabetes can be prevented with early pharmacological intervention. Diabetes Care 2013;34;(suppl 2):S202–S209.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Number (in millions) of adults with diabetes by diabetes medication status, United States, 1997–2011 Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/meduse/fig1.htm. Accesssed December 10, 2013
- Bartholow M. Top 200 drugs of 2012. Pharmacy Times 2013;79;(7):Published online. Available at: https://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/issue/2013/july2013/top-200-drugs-of-2012. Accessed December 10, 2013
- American Diabetes Association. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012;35;(6):1364–1379.
- Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. AACE comprehensive diabetes management algorithm. Endocr Pract 2013;19;(2):327–336.
- Bailey T. Options for combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: comparison of ADA/ACE position statement and AACE/ACE algorithm. Am J Med 2013;126;(9A):S10–S20.
- AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract 2007;13;(suppl 1):1–68.
- Peyrot M, Kruger DF, Rubin RR, et al. Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care 2010;33;(2):240–245.
- Pearson TL. Practical aspects of insulin pen devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4;(3):522–531.
- Novo Nordisk. Insulin pens and needles. Available at: https://www.novonordisk.com/patients/diabetes-care/insulin-pens-and-needles.html. Accessed November 11, 2014
- Lilly Diabetes. Humalog Luxura HD. Available at: https://www.humalog.com/humapen-luxura-hdinsulin-pen.aspx. Accessed December 5, 2013
- Haak T, Edelman S, Walter C, et al. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device SoloSTAR versus FlexPen, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open label study. Clin Ther 2007;29;(4):650–660.
- Hemmingsen H, Niemeyer M, Rye Hansen M, et al. A prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism and a lower injection force than other prefilled insulin pens. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13;(12):1207–1211.
- Wright B, Bellone J,
et al. A review of insulin pen devices and use in the elderly diabetic population. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes 2010;3:53–63. McCoy
- Lexi Comp Online. Available at: http://online.lexi.com. Accessed November 15, 2013
- Brunton S. Insulin delivery systems: reducing barriers to insulin therapy and advancing diabetes mellitus treatment. Am J Med 2008;121;(suppl 6):S35–S41.
- Korytkowski M, Bell D, Jacobsen C, et al. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2003;25;(11):2836–2848.
- Davis EM, Christensen CM, Nystrom KK, et al. Patient satisfaction and costs associated with insulin administered by pen device or syringe during hospitalization. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2008;65;(14):1347–1357.
- Davis EM, Bebee A, Crawford L, et al. Nurse satisfaction using insulin pens in hospitalized patients. The Diabetes Educator 2009;35;(5):799–809.
- Bohannon NJV. Insulin delivery using pen devices: simple-to-use tools may help young and old alike. Postgrad Med 1999;106;(5):57–68.
- Cobden D, Lee WC, Balu S, et al. Health outcomes and economic impact of therapy conversion to a biphasic insulin analog pen among privately insured patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy 2007;27;(7):948–962.
- Ward LG, Aton SS. Impact of an interchange program to support use of insulin pens. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2011;68;(14):1349–1352.
- Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Hospitals should reconsider insulin pen use, says ISMP. Available at: https://www.ismp.org/pressroom/PR20130207.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2014
American Association of Diabetes Educators 2008 Consensus Summit. Insulin pump therapy: guidelines for successful outcomes. September 18, 2008. Chicago, Illinois.
- Diabetesnet.com. Comparison of current insulin pumps. Available at: https://www.diabetesnet.com/diabetes-technology/insulin-pumps/pump-comparison/. Accessed December 6, 2013
- Insulet Corporation. Omnipod system overview. Available at: https://www.myomnipod.com/about Accessed June 23, 2014
- Kanakis SJ, Watts C, Leichter SB. The business of insulin pumps in diabetes care: clinical and economic considerations. Clinical Diabetes 2002;20;(4):214–216.
- Valeritas. V-Go. Available at: https://www.go-vgo.com. Accessed December 5, 2013
- Rosenfeld CR, Bohannon NJ, Bode B, et al. The V-Go insulin-delivery device used in clinical practice: patient perception and retrospective analysis of glycemic control. Endocr Pract 2012;18;(5):660–667.
- Afrezza package insert Danbury, Connecticut: MannKind Corporation. 2014;
- MannKind Corporation. Afrezza Available at: https://www.afrezza.com/. Accessed November 11, 2014
- Victoza (liraglutide—rDNA origin) injection, prescribing information Plainsboro, New Jersey: NovoNordisk. April 2013;
- Byetta (exenatide) injection, prescribing information Princeton, New Jersey: Bristol-Myers Squibb. February 2013;
- Bydureon (exenatide long-acting) injectable suspension, prescribing information Princeton, New Jersey: Bristol-Myers Squibb. February 2013;
- Marathe CS, Rayner CK, Jones KL, et al. Relationships between gastric emptying, postprandial glycemia, and incretin hormones. Diabetes Care 2013;36;(5):1396–1405.
- Garber AJ. Long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. a review of their efficacy and tolerability. Diabetes Care 2013;34;(suppl 2):S278–S284.
- Symlin (pramlintide acetate) injection, prescribing information San Diego, California: Amylin Pharmaceuticals. July 2008;